Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 865 benchmarked: Performance soars, but not much - pierceweread

We learned quite a little about Qualcomm's next-generation Snapdragon 865 last calendar week, except for one affair: how dissolute it is. Now we know—it's potentially the fastest around. Well, around Android, in any event.

Patc our CPU and PC coverage leans heavy on benchmarking, we tend to focus more on the holistic experience of using phones like the Samsung Galaxy S10+, rather than just the performance. But benchmarks still matter, of course, so we jumped at the chance to test Qualcomm's new Snapdragon 865 terminal week, in a demonstration entourage at the society's Snapdragon Technology Summit in Maui, Hawaii.

Keep in mind that these were demonstration devices provided by Qualcomm, and they represent a very specific put back of prosody. While our results are sure as shooting indicative of how the chip will perform in the real number world, thesearen't real-world phones. The performance leave vary past manufacturer.

So, we were able-bodied to try out the phones some in what you would call the default way, as advisable as a substitute way that leaned Sir Thomas More hard on the "performance" cores of the Snapdragon 865 computer architecture. These numbers would be a act more representative of phones that emphasize cannonball along instead of battery life, with several phones offering a toggle to switch modes. (Regrettably, we didn't have a encounter to test the Snapdragon 765G, which is even more optimized for motorized play compared to the 765. Both chips are likely to embody identical common among middle-range phones like the Pixel 4a.)

We compared the new Snapdragon 865 to phones using some nowadays's Snapdragon 855 American Samoa well as the Snapdragon 855 Plus, a slightly quicker mid-bike refresh that was introduced in the summer of this year. We also included Apple's newest A13 Technology CPU, which powers the iPhone 11.

Mark Hachman / IDG

The Snapdragon 865, tested

As you can see, the numbers were rather interesting, placing the Snapdragon 865 at or near the top of the great deal. (We've outlined the "performance mode" art in blackamoor to differentiate them from the standard, default configuration.) Alas, our limited testing time meant that we didn't wealthy person time to use the reference work designs for a prolonged period, and we have no camera examination for you at this point, either.

We use the Geekbench benchmark to evaluate phone CPUs from a computation standpoint, looking at single-core likewise as the multi-core performance. Multi-threaded applications bear witness the 865 at its world-class, spell single-core performance seems to fall below that of the Snapdragon 855 Positive. Interestingly, the Snapdragon 865's multi-Congress of Racial Equality performance at the default level is about 30 percent higher than that of the 855 chip utilized in the Galaxy S10+. Merely compared to the 855 Plus, the difference is just 2 percent.

Mark Hachman / IDG

We've organized this graph hierarchically around the Geekbench multicore benchmark, but the single-core performance, as well American Samoa the raw compute numbers, are also represented.Due to an error, some of the benchmark numbers on the OnePlus 7T were entered incorrectly in an originally version.

We too tested the Snapdragon 865 and past phones exploitation the PCMark Forg 2.0 benchmark, which demonstrates how it volition perform along quotidian tasks like entanglement browsing and editing video and images. Unluckily, Work 2.0 isn't free for iOS.

Mark Hachman / IDG

PCMark's Work test besides shows the Snapdragon 865 on top, though the numbers are clustered closely enough to probably not make much of a deviation. UL, the developer, hasn't released a version of the benchmark for iOS.

American Samoa more versions of PC games are ported to smartphone platforms like the Snapdragon 865, we'll see more and Sir Thomas More accent existence placed connected 3D performance. Present, we use 3DMark's Sling Shot Extreme benchmark to test how well the 865's Adreno GPU essence performs.

Mark Hachman / IDG

The 3DMark Scarf bandage Shot Extreme bench mark pushes the limits of the Snapdragon 865's Adreno GPU, evaluating how well it would perform playing mobile games and other tasks.

We also performed a few to a greater extent tests, though without context against other phones. Both of the GFxBench Aztec Ruins Vulkan and OpenGL Off-Screen tests yielded 20 frames per second at 1440p, while the similar Manhattan test (1440p, Fixed Metre offscreen) yielded 50.38 fps. What's notable is how far ahead Apple is when it comes to performance. The A13 Bionic already fundamentally laps the 865. Tthe A14 is expected to go up to a 5nm process, which should cede some other speed advance. At this point, Qualcomm should call IT a day and admit information technology'll never catch up.

That said, we won't have whatever definitive tests of the Snapdragon 865's performance until we get actual transportation ironware to trial run. We couldn't measure battery life at all. As they stand, however, these tests are a good leading indicant that Snapdragon 865 phones should embody worth waiting for.

Correction: The Geekbench graph has been updated on Dec. 17 to correct information that was previously incorrectly entered.

Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/398506/qualcomm-snapdragon-865-benchmark-performance.html

Posted by: pierceweread.blogspot.com

Share this post